Negligent Security
When a business’s failure to provide basic security lets a foreseeable attack happen, it can be liable — but a 2023 change lets juries put fault on the criminal too. Here is the current landscape.
What Negligent Security Is
Property owners have a duty to keep lawful visitors reasonably safe. When a business ignores a foreseeable risk of crime — in a poorly lit parking lot, an apartment complex with broken locks, a venue with known prior incidents — and a visitor is attacked, the owner can be liable for negligent security.
Foreseeability is the heart of these cases — often shown through prior crimes at or near the property that put the owner on notice.
What HB 837 Changed
The 2023 reform reshaped these claims. It created a framework allowing the fact-finder to apportion fault to the person who actually committed the crime, alongside the property owner — which can reduce the owner’s share. It also provided certain presumptions for property owners who implement listed security measures. These changes make proving and structuring a negligent security case more complex than before.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I sue a business if I was attacked on their property in Florida?
Did HB 837 change negligent security claims in Florida?
Charged Under This Statute?
A statute on a page is not the same as your case. Talk to an attorney who has handled these charges — free, confidential.
